Employee referral programs are a popular and trusted recruiting method. Companies like them because referred candidates tend to be a strong cultural fit and stay longer in their roles. Employees like them because they can earn bonuses or rewards for successful referrals.
But there’s a diversity dilemma with referral programs. The things that make them so effective — leveraging networks and ensuring cultural alignment — can also undermine diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) efforts.
I’ll explain how it happens, why it matters, and, most importantly, what companies can do about it. Read on to learn how to balance effective recruiting with an inclusive hiring process.
In this article, when we talk about diversity in the workplace, the term “underrepresented groups” typically refers to communities that face demographic barriers to equal representation within companies relative to their numbers in the broader population.
These groups have historically experienced institutional and systemic discrimination that continues to impact their economic mobility and career advancement over time negatively. As a result, they are often overlooked during recruiting and hiring processes, whether consciously or unconsciously.
Underrepresented groups often include, but are not limited to:
Creating equitable access to opportunities for talented individuals from these communities is an essential piece of the diversity equation for companies committed to positive social impact. An inclusive mindset recognizes that there are still obstacles to representation, and all people deserve to feel welcomed, valued, and able to reach their full potential.
Lack of diversity in referrals is rarely ill-intentioned. Employees naturally refer people similar to themselves without realizing it.
Similarity breeds feelings of understanding, comfort, and trust. So, referrers gravitate to candidates who look, act, and think like them and those they know well.
This limits exposure to people from different backgrounds who could bring fresh, innovative perspectives. And it narrows the talent pool to demographically homogenous networks.
Many companies still lack diversity in leadership and internal employee resource groups. This scarcity can indicate to underrepresented groups that they wouldn’t feel like they belong.
And because referrals are typically given priority, external candidates are less likely to be considered for open positions. This reliance on insider contacts indirectly excludes underrepresented groups from opportunities.
When new hires continually fit a common mold, current employees take notice. Organizations risk disengaging these underrepresented workers by allowing exclusionary practices that result in a lack of diversity at all levels.
Companies are especially vulnerable to high turnover when underrepresented employees don’t see representation in leadership to indicate possibilities for advancement.
Moral arguments aside, the business case for diversity is clear. Diverse teams drive innovation, reflect increasingly diverse customer demographics, and lead to better financial performance.
Rather than incentivizing referrals, companies should focus on casting a wider net for talent, building partnerships with diversity-focused organizations, ensuring equitable hiring processes, and prioritizing the retention of underrepresented groups.
Referrals may happen organically, but a multifaceted, diversity-focused recruitment strategy is vital for building innovative teams that reflect our multicultural world.
Copyright Ivy Blossom Recruits 2024. Ivy Blossom Recruits is a premier LGBTQ+ 🏳️🌈 and woman-owned job search consultancy.